Boarding: the vision thing
Rosalind McCarthy, Headmistress of Cobham
Hall and Chairman of the Boarding Schools’ Association, explains how
the reality of boarding is far from some popular misconceptions of it.
As
Chairman of the Boarding Schools’ Association for the last year I have
had the opportunity of observing at close quarters the surprisingly
wide variety of schools which contribute to the world of boarding. Many
people still have a stereotypical image of boarding schools
in their minds, but the 450 schools in the BSA could not offer a
broader educational choice. There are the large well-established
house-based schools, coeducational and single-sex schools. There are
schools for special talents and special needs, international schools
and schools with or without a religious foundation. BSA is the umbrella
organisation which serves all these schools whether they are from the independent
or state sector. Its new training scheme provides qualifications for
those working in residential education, and membership of BSA gives
parents the assurance of quality. Those working in the world of
boarding today provide enough variety to suit every child’s needs yet
we work towards a common purpose, despite common misunderstandings
about our schools, and despite some of the difficulties boarding has
faced in recent years.
George Bush talked about “The Vision
Thing” and today everyone is supposed to have both a vision statement
and a mission statement. The Daily Telegraph’s weekend
supplement recently reminded us that: “Once upon a time, someone who
admitted to a vision was either an Old Testament prophet, a religious
mystic or mad. Nowadays he’s likely to be a member of management!”
However, whereas the vision statement is about values, the mission
statement addresses harsh realities. So while your vision statement
might declare “our aim is to achieve world peace” your mission
statement would be forced to admit “we supply heavy artillery to the
world’s emerging countries”. In boarding, our vision ideally may be of
working in true partnership and harmony with students’ families in
order to produce well-balanced, well-educated and responsible members
of society. However, in these straitened times our mission is probably
to attract as many customers as possible, and when we get them, to put
right the ghastly things that may be happening at home!
Boarding
Heads know that for any mission to be successful, the perception of
boarding must be the right one. There is serious frustration that
recognition of what we achieve is still often lacking. We are all
concerned about the frontiers of misinformed perception which boarding
has faced in recent years. It has been said that: “everything that you
read in the newspapers is absolutely true except for the rare story of
which you happen to have first hand knowledge!” Boarding Heads and
their customers are able to read between the lies.
The art of
persuasion has taken over from the pursuit of truth. The truth is that
there are as many happy, well-adjusted children at boarding schools as at day schools and as many bad experiences to be had at day schools as there may be in boarding schools.
Schools of any kind can be good or bad, so why the witch-hunt against
boarding, and why only against schools? Residential education at
university is considered not only socially acceptable but positively
desirable, yet everyone knows that the standards of accommodation and
pastoral care for boarders in university towns fall well below the
standards students may have been enjoying a few months earlier at
school. With regard to the stereotyped image of the boarding school
bully, the worst case of bullying I ever encountered was at a
coeducational state secondary day school where I had to pretend to be
giving lunch-time detentions as protection for a teenage boy,
terrorised, both verbally and physically, by a veritable virago of a
middle school girl.
Clearly, Boarding has not only suffered in
recent years from adverse media attention, but from other well-known
factors such as the unhelpful economic climate, the reduction in the
armed forces, in the diplomatic corps and in the sponsorship of pupils
by business and industry. Esther Ranzten’s campaigns against bullying
and child abuse have coloured public opinion unfairly against boarding
as a whole, and parental attitudes have changed towards the upbringing
of children. Any boarding school which has not
recognised and addressed these factors will not survive, and sadly but
predictably some have not. It is sad because, as schools disappear,
with their very individual characters and strengths, parental choice
becomes more limited, and the needs of the individual child are not so
easily met.
It is obvious that, in many cases, a boarding
education is absolutely vital. I was educated at what was then the
Folkestone County School for Girls, which had a boarding house attached
for the children of those who lived and worked abroad. For several
years in the 60s, I taught in a boys’ boarding school
in Zambia, far out in the bush near to a tiny village called Mungwi. We
were the only school for miles around – the boarding houses were a
necessity. Some Round Square projects in recent years have built simple
residential accommodation for schools in third world countries because
the same needs apply now. In the same way, State boarding schools
in Scotland, for example, provide education for those whose homes are
on remote islands too difficult to reach on a daily basis.
As
with universities, so with schools, special talents and educational
needs cannot all be catered for in every town. Musicians educated at
Chethams, the Purcell School or the Yehudi Menuhin School come from all
over the country and the world. It is just not possible to have a Royal
Ballet School in every city, so students must board in Richmond for
their education. Schools which cater for the physically handicapped,
deaf or partially sighted are few and far between. Boarding is more
than a convenience in these cases, it is a necessity. Schools renowned
for their sporting, scientific or artistic tuition may not be suitably
sited next door to those who want them, and not all schools have
dyslexia centres or specialist tuition for English as a Foreign
Language. Daily travel may be impossible to reach them. Business or
personal circumstances sometimes make it necessary for parents to opt
for boarding, either short or long term. My own school often has day
students staying on a bed and breakfast basis for the odd day or two,
or booked in for several weeks as circumstances dictate.
One preparatory school
has recently achieved a great deal of success by introducing
‘sleep-overs’ for its students. None of its 70 converts lives more than
half-an-hour’s drive away from the school, but the youngest children
can book one ‘sleep-over’ a week, rising to three or five as they get
older and their enthusiasm grows. Perhaps in this day and age we should
adopt more user-friendly terms and become known as sleep-over schools!
Children and parents understand this concept and find it very
attractive.
I heard of one small boy looking at brochures of preparatory schools
who asked his parents: “Is this a hotel for children?” For senior
students with their single rooms, en suite showers, sports centres,
tennis courts and swimming pools ‘Boarding’ is the wrong word. These
are hotel facilities worthy of several stars. Pippa Pop-ins at the
infant stage of the residential market does not hesitate to be known as
a hotel for children. Hotel prices can be expensive, and boarding schools
are constantly berated for their high fees, but having brought up two
children myself, I know it does not come cheap to provide the food,
light, heat and laundry facilities they need, not to mention the cost
in time and money of transporting them to clubs, swimming pool, music
lessons and libraries.
With regard to expense, it does seem a pity that more people are not aware of the state boarding schools.
Hotel fees are payable of course, but tuition is free. It also seems a
pity that Government assisted places for those who need a residential
education have not been available for use in independent schools.
There are opportunities for co-operation between the new Government and
the boarding sector and it is encouraging that discussions are held
regularly between the Boarding Schools’ Association and the DfEE.
Boarding,
despite what the papers say, has moved with the times. Gone are the
days when Cecil Reddie of Abbotsholme posted rules to regulate the
proper position for sleeping in bed, and worse, the precise time at
which boys and masters were allowed to use the earth closets! “Violin
boys are to go after 8.30 so as not to lose their violin practice”!
Even the self-styled members of the Boarding Survivor’s Group cannot
indefinitely continue to judge boarding present on boarding past.
The boarding school
pupils of today have access to an educational experience, not confined
to classroom hours, which is more user-friendly than ever before and
more widely available than people tend to think. It is well worth
considering this educational choice for your child.
Click here to search for independent schools.
Click here to promote your school or company.
Click here to purchase the guide.